We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are Procurement Regulations?

By Staci A. Terry
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Procurement regulations are rules that local, state, and federal governments must follow when they award contracts for services to private companies. The purpose behind procurement oversight is to ensure that governments act in a fair and cost-efficient manner in awarding these often lucrative contracts. Public procurement regulations operate to avoid the perception of any impropriety in awarding government contracts and to make certain the government is wisely spending taxpayer funds.

Different procurement regulations govern the process various government bodies must go through when they make contracts available to private companies. A separate set of procurement regulations guides federal governments in public procurement activities, and state law — in the form of a state procurement act — dictates the steps state and local governments must take to guarantee that they are awarding government contracts in a fair and evenhanded manner. Unfortunately, these procurement regulations set forth processes that can be quite complex and time-consuming for private companies to follow. Although governments have attempted to simplify these procedures, procurement regulations still tend to be fairly burdensome for private companies, especially for those companies that have never before bid on government contracts.

Competition for government contracts, predominantly at the federal and state government levels, can be quite intense. As a result, companies often limit their attempts to obtain such contracts to a certain number each year. Companies also often employ outside consultants to assist with their government contract bids; the goal is to reduce the expense of seeking these contracts and maximize their chances of receiving these contracts.

Procurement laws, particularly at the federal level, contain a number of very specific criteria for awarding government contracts to private companies. For instance, companies that qualify as small businesses must receive a certain percentage of federal government contracts, and other demographics of business owners, such as minorities and women, also are present in procurement regulations. Additionally, the federal government must award certain contracts solely to traditionally disadvantaged businesses, such as those owned by minorities or businesses in areas with high unemployment rates.

Likewise, a certain state procurement act also may require that government officials on the state or local level award contracts based on certain eligibility requirements of businesses or their owners. Each state’s procurement regulations differ according to state law, so a trait that qualifies a business for a government contract in one state may disqualify that same business for a government contract in another state. That makes it tricky for those trying to win a contract.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By indemnifyme — On Sep 28, 2011

@Monika - You must live under a rock if you think that women and minorities aren't discriminated against anymore! I think it's great that a certain amount of government procurement contracts have to go to them. I don't see how this is any different from awarding a certain number of contracts to areas with a high unemployment rate.

However, I didn't realize how expensive it was for companies to try to win these contracts. It definitely seems like that would put some of the companies out of the running in the first place!

By Monika — On Sep 27, 2011

I think it's great that some of the regulations require the government to award contracts to areas where the unemployment rate is high. As long as the company is qualified, of course.

It seems like it solves two problems-it gets the government the goods and services it needs, and creates jobs for a certain area. This is definitely sensible.

That being said, I'm not sure that I agree with having to give contracts to a certain number of minorities and women. This doesn't seem like it's really necessary anymore, now that discrimination isn't such a big deal.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.