We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Does "No Bill" Mean?

By Christopher John
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

"No bill" is a legal term that indicates that a grand jury has decided that there is not enough evidence to place a criminal suspect on trial in court. Some jurisdictions use a grand jury to determine whether a suspect should face a criminal trial. A grand jury is a group of people selected randomly from the community. If a grand jury decides there is sufficient evidence, it issues a "true bill" that a suspect must face a criminal trial.

Historically, laypersons were allowed to prosecute anyone in the community. The function of the grand jury was to safeguard against malicious prosecutions. In theory, a grand jury is still supposed to protect against improper prosecutions. Critics, however, claim that grand juries serve only as a rubber stamp for prosecutors because grand jury members do not fully understand their role and are overly dependent on the evidence presented to them by the prosecutor.

With a grand jury system, a prosecutor issues a document called an indictment which identifies a suspect and the crimes the suspect is accused of committing. The prosecutor gives the indictment to the grand jury. He then presents witnesses and other evidence. If the grand jury determines that the evidence justifies putting a criminal suspect on trial, it writes the phrase “true bill” on the indictment. This is, in effect, an endorsement of the prosecutor's charges against the suspect. A grand jury writes “no bill” on the indictment when it decides that there is not enough evidence to bring a case against the suspect.

Previously, a grand jury would write the Latin phrase ignoramus on the indictment, which means "we are ignorant." When a grand jury used the term ignoramus, it meant that the evidence presented did not appear true. Now, grand juries commonly use the terms “no bill,” “not found,” or “not a true bill.” Ultimately, the phrases have the same meaning.

Even if a grand jury issues a no bill on an indictment, the prosecutor can resubmit an indictment to the same grand jury or to a new one. In other words, a prosecutor may continue to submit an indictment to a grand jury until he achieves the outcome he desires. Some jurisdictions limit prosecutors by not allowing them to resubmit an indictment more than two times. Other jurisdictions require the prosecutor to get approval from the court before resubmitting an indictment to a grand jury. This is why some critics argue that prosecutors can abuse the grand jury system.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon925242 — On Jan 10, 2014

I was raped, and became pregnant. The grand jury found a' "no bill" because there wasn't enough evidence. Really? The state of NJ is a joke.

By live2shop — On Nov 12, 2011

@lovealot - I kind of think that the grand jury system and that the no bill by grand jury is outdated. It was started at a time when anyone in the community could act as a prosecutor and bring criminal charges against someone. The grand jury and no bill was a way to have ordinary citizens decide if the "prosecutor" had enough evidence to bring criminal charges.

I guess today it is used in cases where there's a real question about whether there's enough evidence for criminal charges.

By lovealot — On Nov 11, 2011

In today's world, I don't quite get why they still have grand juries convening to see if a prosecutor has enough evidence to bring a criminal to trial.

I know it's a way to check to make sure a prosecutor isn't just trying to bring charges against criminals without good cause. But if a grand jury gives a "no bill" directive, the prosecutor can ask for a grand jury proceeding again. It just doesn't make sense to me.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.