We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Partnership by Estoppel?

By Christopher John
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At DelightedCooking, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A partnership by estoppel is a doctrine or a legal concept that allows a court to provide a remedy to a plaintiff, such as awarding him monetary damages. Essentially, this doctrine requires a plaintiff to prove that a defendant’s conduct caused him or her to believe that the defendant was in a partnership, which resulted in the plaintiff’s damages. Originally, the concept came from judicial decisions or the common law, but some jurisdictions eventually enacted laws codifying it. In other words, a legislative body passed a law defining the legal elements of a partnership by estoppel.

A plaintiff has the burden of proving a partnership by estoppel. In most jurisdictions, he does this by showing that a defendant held himself out as a partner, or that the defendant consented to others holding him out as a partner; that the plaintiff knew of the defendant holding himself out as a partner; that the plaintiff reasonably relied on the claimed partnership; and that plaintiff suffered damages. If a plaintiff proves these elements, a judge may rule in favor of the plaintiff, who is then likely to recover damages from a defendant.

As an example, Brown and Green are lawyers who share office space, a receptionist, and a telephone number to minimize their expenses. They also advertise their legal services as "Brown and Green, attorneys-at-law." The receptionist answers their phone as the law office of Brown and Green. These lawyers, however, do not share their earnings, nor do they discuss their cases with one another because Brown is an accident lawyer and Green is a tax lawyer.

Sarah sees their advertisement on a billboard, she calls the number, and she schedules an appointment with Brown. She goes to the office and decides to hire Brown to help her with an accident case. She is unhappy with the outcome and files a lawsuit against these lawyers for legal malpractice. Sarah has to prove that there was a partnership by estoppel for a court to allow the suit against both lawyers to continue. According to this example, Sarah has a good chance of succeeding because it is reasonable to believe that the lawyers had a partnership.

The doctrine developed from judicial decisions, but as time passed, the legislative bodies of some jurisdictions recognized this concept. For instance, in the US, some states have adopted statutes that define a partnership by estoppel. 

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By allenJo — On Sep 27, 2011

@Monika - I agree. I think the estoppels definition given in the article makes it clear that the partnership is one that is explicit or implied, given the nature of the setup.

Lawyers know the law better than anyone else. I hardly think they would enter into such an arrangement without knowing how the public would perceive their business model, or the legal implications of a lawsuit filed against one of the partners.

On that note, I think it should be noted that no one should enter into a partnership arrangement lightly. If the ship goes down, both partners can go down with it, regardless of who is technically at fault.

By Monika — On Sep 27, 2011

I think this makes sense. It's sort of one of those instances of "if it walks like a duck, and looks like a duck...it must be a duck." I don't think it would be fair for people to be in a partnership, and then try to claim they weren't for legal purposes!

However, I have to admit that when I heard this term I thought it was something different. I thought a partnership by estoppel was where a court forces two people to be partners. Like if two people agreed to a partnership and then one backed out, the court would make them go through with it anyway. However, the real definition for partnership by estoppel makes much more sense!

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.