We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Primus Inter Pares?

By John Markley
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Primus inter pares is a Latin phrase that means "first among equals," with "first" meant in the sense of being highest in importance or honor. It refers to the most senior person among a group of people with the same office, rank, or title, or to the dominant person in a group of people who are nominally equal but regard one of their members as their leader or most important member. Many organizations have a person or position with this status, either officially or unofficially.

Many government officials are considered primus inter pares today, and others still retain titles that allude to the idea. On the United States Supreme Court, the chief justice is considered the court's senior member and has greater administrative authority than the eight associate justices, but all nine justices have an equal vote in the court's decisions. The political title prime minister originally meant that its bearer was the foremost minister of a ruling monarch, and so merely primus inter pares among government ministers or the cabinet rather than head of government, though in most modern cases this is no longer an accurate description of a prime minister's status or power. Meetings of the Federal Council of Switzerland are presided over by the president of the confederation, an office that is held for a term of one year and customarily rotates among the Federal Council's seven members. Despite his or her position as the president of the Swiss government's highest executive body, the president of the confederation is not the head of state; instead the Federal Council holds that title collectively.

The clerical hierarchies of many religious organizations have a position whose holder is considered primus inter pares. In the Eastern Orthodox church, which is composed of a number of autocephalous, or self-headed, Orthodox churches in full communion with each other, the patriarch of Constantinople is considered the foremost official of the Orthodox faith and bears the title of ecumenical, or universal, patriarch. However, he has direct authority only over the Orthodox church of Constantinople. The other autocephalous Orthodox churches govern themselves, and their bishops or patriarchs are not appointed by the ecumenical patriarch or under his authority. In the Catholic church, the dean of the College of Cardinals presides over the college and summons it to the papal conclave to elect a new pope when the previous pope dies or abdicates, but has no authority over the other cardinals.

In the ancient Roman Republic, the primus inter pares of the Senate was called the princeps senatus, first of the Senate. The title was bestowed every five years by the censors, Roman legal officials responsible for holding public morals upon a member of the Senate who held the respect of his peers and a reputation for integrity and public service. The princeps senatus originally had no powers or privileges aside from the right to speak first on topics brought before the Senate, but he enjoyed great prestige. Later, the title of princeps senatus, or simply princeps, was adopted by the first Roman emperor, Augustus, in order to maintain the legal fiction that he was merely the foremost citizen of a still-intact republic and not an autocrat.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By CBlizzard — On Nov 03, 2014

Actually Augustus started as an equal in a Triumvirate which is only three people. Two people are much easier to subordinate than 10, 15, or 100. Today most modern institutions which employ the Primus Inter Pares have a large number of members. Today the college of cardinals has 120 voting members while the United States Supreme Court has 9. I'm not saying we shouldn't be careful of the potential for a single person to assume complete authority but in an age of internet communication and all the check and balances which regulate power in a 21st century institution, it would be much harder to gain complete control today than in the Augustan Age.

By Steamland — On Nov 03, 2014

This system has never really worked in history, why do we keep trying it today?! The problem with being first among equals is that in a system where power is heavily checked, even one person who is above the rest now has the ability to take power for themselves. How do you think Augustus became Emperor of Rome? He started as an equal and then slowly became more and more powerful until no one could control him.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.