We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Security Vetting?

By Jacob Queen
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Security vetting is the examination of a person's background and private life in order to make sure the individual can be safely trusted to hold certain jobs or learn secret information. This process can vary quite a bit depending on the reasons behind the vetting, but it usually involves things like background checks, assessments of competency, and drug tests. Sometimes people find the process of undergoing a security investigation very unpleasant because many aspects of their private lives are generally put under an uncommon level of scrutiny.

One of the main things often examined during security vetting is the possibility of criminal behavior. This would generally include any previous convictions on a person’s record, and it might also include further investigations to make sure the person isn’t currently engaged in any secret questionable behaviors. During a security investigation, a person might be rejected for crimes he hasn’t actually been convicted of, mainly because there is usually a concern that a person engaged in something criminal might be susceptible to various blackmailing schemes.

Another concern during most security vetting procedures is a person’s lifestyle and habits. The investigations will often look for things like drug problems or a history of unreliable behavior. For example, if a person has a long history of financial difficulties, those hiring for security-sensitive jobs might be concerned about a vulnerability to bribery, especially if the person were to find himself in a financial bind of some sort.

During many security investigations, there might be interviews with the applicants' family members and friends, and some of these interviews may even delve into very personal issues that have nothing to do with the applicant. This is because there is often a concern that people around the applicant may have shady backgrounds and might find a way to compromise the applicant and get access to secret data. Studying the applicant’s social contacts also gives a broader idea of who the applicant is on a personal level, which might be an important issue.

Many different kinds of jobs may require a security vetting procedures. Some of them would include things like intelligence personnel and other government-oriented security jobs. There are also jobs in private industry that require people to undergo some level of vetting for many different reasons. The non-invasive aspect of the vetting is usually related to the sensitive nature of the information the person will have access to. For less sensitive jobs, it might be as simple as a quick criminal background check, while others may spend many months under investigation.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Logicfest — On Dec 22, 2014

@Melonlity -- Joe could bring an action, sure, but only if he can prove he was denied employment because he filed for bankruptcy. Most employers won't tell why they refused to hire someone, so how will Joe find out that was the reason XYZ didn't give him a job?

Also, no one can be denied employment solely because they filed for bankruptcy. It could be that XYZ didn't want Joe in a position where he was handling a lot of money. Is that OK?

I don't know. That is for a court to decide.

Still, vetting is a good idea. Employers want to know what they are getting and whom they can trust.

By Melonlity — On Dec 21, 2014

This is one area where businesses can get into trouble. Vetting someone is one thing, but going too far into their backgrounds is something else entirely.

For example, let's say that Joe applies for a job with XYZ, Inc. XYZ runs a background check on Joe and finds that he had filed for bankruptcy at some point in the past.

The folks at XYZ don't want to deal with that kind of thing, so they refuse to hire Joe.

Is there a problem? Yes, indeed. Federal law prohibits excluding someone from employment because they filed for bankruptcy. Joe could possibly bring an action against XYZ.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.