We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is the Make My Day Law?

By Mike Howells
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
MyLawQuestions is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At MyLawQuestions, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Make My Day Law, more generally known as the Castle Doctrine, speaks to the idea that an individual is justified in using deadly force, generally with a firearm, to defend himself when threatened on his own property. The "Make My Day" nickname, which was applied specifically to a 1985 Colorado state Castle Doctrine, refers to a line spoken by Clint Eastwood's trigger-happy cop character Harry Callahan in the American film Sudden Impact.

The idea behind the Make My Day Law goes back hundreds of years to English Common Law, upon which the laws of many countries, including the United States, are based. In particular, it states that a property owner should be safe from violent attack while on his own property, and may defend himself to resist such an attack. In some jurisdictions the law provides a justifiable homicide defense.

In the United States, variations of the Make My Day Law differ from state to state. By default, states without a specific Castle Doctrine provision generally have instead what is known as a duty to retreat. This means the residents of a home, when it is infiltrated, must retreat and verbally declare intent to use deadly force before doing so. If this declaration does not happen there is no automatic legal justification. As of 2008, roughly a dozen states, including the District of Columbia, have duty to retreat provisions in law, though in some of those twelve is it based on case law and not specific legislation.

State legislatures looking to strengthen their Castle Doctrines generally draft what is known as stand-your-ground provisions, based on the original Colorado Make My Day Law. This law provides that the owner of a dwelling is immune from civil or criminal repercussions when using any type of physical force, including deadly force, under certain conditions.

The specific conditions of the Make My Day Law are that an invader has made unlawful entry onto the property, that there is a reasonable belief the invader is or intends to commit a crime on the property, and that there is a reasonable belief the invader may use physical force himself. If these conditions are satisfied the immunity applies, and no verbal warning must be issued. Though again, it varies by jurisdiction, in most cases the presumption of innocence rests with the property owner in being justified.

Some states go even further and make it legal for such stand-your-ground laws to apply outside of one's home. Florida is one such state, where an individual may use deadly force when assailed at any location he has a right to be. As of 2010, more than 30 states in the US have some degree of a Stand Your Ground Law.

MyLawQuestions is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By AnswerMan — On Feb 06, 2014

I have a feeling many states are going to re-examine their Make My Day laws in light of the George Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman was acquitted of murder because of Florida's Stand Your Ground version of the Castle Doctrine. Even though the victim, Trayvon Martin, had no weapon on his person, Zimmerman argued that the young African-American man confronted him after a brief interrogation.

The difficulty with any such law is the requirement of a declaration before action. The intruder has to penetrate the person's home, and clearly intend to commit a criminal act. The homeowner is supposed to feel so threatened that deadly force becomes an option. There is also supposed to be a verbal warning before pulling the trigger or swinging a bat.

The problem I have is that only two people will ever truly know what took place that night, and one of them is dead. The jury has to take the word of the homeowner that all of those elements were met.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

MyLawQuestions, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.